Hmm, comments, anyone?

Meanwhile, the experiments have not yet continued; I'm looking for a liquid whose taste might be more easily changed through distant healing (I guess half a meter or more could suffice) and which would not contain alcohol.

My husband was drinking a can of beer that was in a thick rubber sleeve to keep it cool. When his beer was 3/4 gone, I asked him if I could try running energy into it. I held my hands around the entire contraption (sleeve on can) and ran energy for 2 minutes. He didn't think I would change it...especially protected by all that rubber. However, when he tasted it, he was surprised that it "tasted different"...not better, not worse, just different.

That was the first time I was able to demonstrate to him that QT was real, not just a placebo mumbo jumbo.

Thanks, I've also been thinking whether such a sleeve could prove useful!

Will have to get one and see whether it prevents heat conduction to a significant enough degree.

In the case you described there are no blinds (both of you know that the liquid being tasted has been tampered with) or controls (nothing to compare the taste to), a reviewer would have no choice but to question whether suggestion -or, a significant enough temperature change - plays a role there.

But I'm glad to hear that it at least did the trick for your husband!

This message has been edited. Last edited by: SeaLion,

Hello!

There's been a rather long pause in these experiments. But, as my first video workshop is approaching, I decided to take this up again, this time armed with somewhat stale white wine & a thermometer (a fast one, with 0.1'C accuracy).

To make it short:

- It seems that I have learned to taste (at least) a temperature difference of 0.2'C
- I've been so far been unable to produce a taste difference when there is no temperature difference (to the accuracy of 0.1'C)
- warmer wine (or water) seems to taste "smoother", "less stingy", "better"
- differences in room temperature may confound the results of a distant charging setting; i.e. when leaving a glass on the kitchen table and another one on the living room, there'll in many cases be a discernible temperature (and a taste) difference over some 10 minutes or so (this has to be confirmed with further tests)

These results seem to support the hypothesis that changes in taste in a QT basic workshop -like setting would actually be the result of temperature change

Next, I'll be trying produce a taste difference by just warming up the glass by holding it and not running energy.

If this produces similar results to the experiment(s) described above, I'll replicate the experiment using leather gloves to lessen the chances of accidentally running energy into the glass. This should also contribute to the problem with missing insulation.

Any insights? I don't fancy the idea of restraining myself from rolling-my-eyes-sighing-in-the-background as the people in my video workshop go 'wow, the charged one really tastes different!'

Related experiences I found on the message board:
- Aqib's water charging & taste difference thread
- Aileenoasis's thread on Energizing and charging water
- Kellie's thread on the benefits of charging water

This message has been edited. Last edited by: SeaLion,

why not try it in an insulated galss, it may keep the temp more stable.

If you use a polystyrene coffee cup like you find at fast food places, you will not be changing the temperature of the fluid since the cup is highly insulated. I've found dramatic changes to the taste of fluid from hands on work, and only very subtle changes from distant energy work.

So far I have indeed been using 'glass' glasses.
Thanks for the tip, I'll try this out!

How about stemware?

Have you tried orange juice? In my basic class the teacher had us run energy into styrofoam cups of orange juice and compare them to cups with uncharged juice. They became less sour.

No, I haven't tried OJ yet - but I will!

Cris, what do you mean by 'stemware'?
(e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stemware)

Stemware is glassware with a stem, e.g., wine glass, water goblet. You'd hold the glass by the stem and wouldn't change the temperature of the liquid inside.

quote:

You'd hold the glass by the stem and wouldn't change the temperature of the liquid inside.

Got it. Although, if I recall correctly from the DVD, Richard instructs to keep the hands next to the water / touching the glass where the water is. Not sure about this, however.

Of course, there's no real reason why doing this with stemware would not work... unless the temperature change is what does the trick.

Damn, I seem to be struggling with my intellect here (rollin' in the 400's, as D. Hawkins might put it). I've also thought that maybe this may limit the results I've been getting: if I think that the taste change may be due to temperature change, then it should not be a surprise if those are the results I'm getting...

There must be some way outta here (said the Joker to the Thief :-)

How about putting the liquid in a thermos bottle? That would insulate it from the heat from your hands. You could also use a thermometer to measure the temperature of charged and uncharged liquids.

The 2 cups of OJ we compared seemed to be at about the same temperature. Styrofoam is an excellent insulator.

Thanks for the thermos suggestion!

Indeed, I have used a thermometer with 0.1'C accuracy to measure the temperatures; and it seems, that I can, at least with tap water, taste (at least) a difference of 0.2'C - with or without charging.

More reports as I get around to doing further experiments.

Hi SeaLion:
I have an experiment/challenge for you:

Buy two identical bottles of wine (same brand, type and year; cheaper is probably better in this case).

Tape a piece of paper marked "QT" onto one bottle and keep them both in separate locations with identical lighting, temperature, & distance from electrical power sources.

We will do a remote energy test on the "QT" bottle for one day, so more than one of us (including you) can sign up to have a go from our respective distant locations (contrary to Richard's experience, I find physical contact and proximity don't matter too much for changing the taste of wine).

Then, the following day, have someone else taste a glass from each bottle, and ask them to smell and taste each one with a bite of bread or cracker and water to clean the their palette, and right down what they can smell and taste each time. Then you do the same.


If you would prefer a non-alcoholic beverage, how about gatorade?

Are you game?

Blessings,
Alfred