I read a post on here about someone who recharged batteries with QT. Yesterday morning I noticed my desk clock had the wrong time, and the second hand was just sticking in one spot. I realized the battery needed replacing. So, I took it out, and ran energy on it for one or two minutes and put it back in. It started back up. Well, here it is 24 hours later, and it is still running with perfect time!

Way to go! Fun, huh!!

that's cool...where did you position your hands to make it work?

Just hold the batteries in your hands. Notice if they get warm or hot. Have fun!

About a week ago when it was 20 below wind chill my car battery was dead. (I knew the battery was old and possibly wouldn't start.) It was too cold to run energy on it while outside. So, I came into the house and ran energy to it, holding an image of it between my hands. Ran energy about 5 minutes. Went out and tried it again, and it started right up.

Much easier then finding a neighbor with jumper cables who would come out in this weather!

I don't doubt that Quantum Touch could have an energizing effect on batteries. When I was a kid I used to hold my 9 volt batteries in my hands for awhile, if they didn't have any juice left. But heating them on a radiator helped also. Heat alone has some effect. We should get an electrical engineer to set up scientific tests.

There are a bunch of reports of battery recharging in the forum; do a search if you're interested. Truth Lover's experience of distant charging isn't from heat.

i also managed to recharge. My phone was dead and after 10 min QT it was operational for several extra hours, then the batter was finished again.

Recharging again with QT did not have any effect anymore. So my guess is that QT extends battery life by REDISTRIBUTING the left-over power in the battery instead of actually recharging the battery.

I invite anyone to attempt the cycle:
-use the batteries until empty
-recharge with QT
-use the batteries until empty
-recharge with QT
-use
-recharge with QT
-ect

Lets call a number of cycles above 3 the proof that QT actually recharges.

Goodluck

Hi, after reading here about recharging batteries by hand I tried it,
and used a voltmeter to record the results.

In summary I found out it worked to use QT to recharge rechargable
batteries, but it took quite a number of hours to bring it up to
full charge. Yet, in a pinch, just a little more juice can allow
for a camera to take a few more shots.

I did try it on a regular AA battery, and could only charge it once,
after that it would not take a charge again. I still need to do
a few more tests to find the best way to hold the batteries.
I would appreciate to hear of other's experiments.

I like this idea and ability to show it's possible with a voltmeter,
as it's a way to 'give scientific proof' to the eyes of skeptics.

My results of my tests and method are on this page:
How to Recharge Batteries Using One's Hands

Betsy

I think you may be on the right track in that you are trying to do some controlled experiments using a voltmeter to measure changes. I would be curious to see an experiment that tests if it is more effective to run energy with the intent of charging batteries than it is to simply hold batteries in the hands. You observed that it's important how you hold the batteries. In any case, it seems that it took a long time for the batteries to have a stronger charge in your experiments.

There is scientific evidence that simply heating batteries gently can revive them. There are chemicals inside of batteries that react to heat as gentle as that of human hands. See point 3 at this link:

Getting the Most Out of Alkaline Batteries

Until further controlled testing is undertaken, I think we should be careful about claiming that QT can charge batteries so as not to make QT appear silly to scientifically-minded people (whether they believe that QT works or not) who know that simply holding batteries in one's hands can revive the chemical processes within them that give them their charge.

If running energy is not more effective for battery charging than simply gently warming batteries, this does not necessarily mean that QT doesn't work. Living beings are not batteries. Maybe running the QT energy is affecting the water in physical bodies in a manner similar to that described by Masuru Emoto in his water books, or maybe it is working on an even subtler level of the spirit for which we do not yet have tools to measure.

Marian

Hi Marian,
You bring up some good points.

The first is if it's more effective to run energy with the intent to charge batteries vs. simply holding the batteries.

To that I would answer that I've found in all heaing and charging, the most effective is when there is zero intention. To hold an intention in mind, means one is using one's mind which reduces one's total energy. When one's mind is totally still, then 'you' are not and 'YOU' are. Trusting that 'YOU' can do it and allowing that is the most effective. In quiet mind state, there is no resistance, it's like you are invisible, as one with source, thus it's the highest energy you can 'channel'. To this, there is no doubt -- for me.

In regards to heating the batteries to revive them, that is interesting. so an experiment would be a non-qt person vs. a qt person (who gets good results with charging) and use voltmeter to compare difference. of course one needs a control - same level of charge, same technqiue of holding and same length of time.

I'm not worried about what others think, as with the voltmeter and subsequent experiements, then it can be shown or not. As it is, i know I can do it, so the why is still left to be determined. I'm open to finding out it has any answer, i don't need confirmation for 'my ability' and if it's just a fluke, then we should know that for sure.

One thing in my article is the charge i can generate between my hands on the voltmeter, which has nothing to do with the batteries. So others could do this as well of different abilities and see what result they get. In my own self-healing process, i notice my vibrational charge doubling nearly every week, so i will rerun the test, i suspect i can generate more mA than when I did the test. Will my battery charging then be more effective? I will check that if the mA goes up. I will add the second round of tests to the page, pro or con.

Betsy

Well I guess I should have been more clear: Running QT energy (whether yang of standard/supercharging which I described in my first post, or yin of Core Transformation which you describe above as having no intent and that you personally find more effective) vs. just holding the batteries. Another test would be to compare simply warming them carefully/gently to normal body temperature (98.6 degrees F, 37 degrees C) without using hands or any body parts (I don't know how you would do this, but it would have to be done very carefully as it can be dangerous to overheat batteries) vs. running QT energy (yang and/or yin) vs. just holding them in the hands.

Let us know what you find out.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Marian,

quote:

Well I guess I should have been more clear: Running QT energy (whether yang of standard/supercharging which I described in my first post, or yin of Core Transformation which you describe above as having no intent and that you personally find more effective) vs. just holding the batteries.

Hi Marian,
Is there a reference that describes clearly the yang/yin aspects, as I am not up to date on the QT lingo? I don't see what post you are referring to.
Betsy

People on the board have been describing the traditional QT and Supercharging as yang, and the Core Transformation (CT) techniques as yin. What you described in your post about not using intention sounded like the Core approach of being and allowing. I only know about CT from the book (haven't had the opportunity to take a class yet), and I still feel like I need to read the book a few more times before I would feel like I really understand anything.

Probably if you do a global search in the forums on yang or yin you could come up with some interesting descriptions.

All the best!

Marian